theForum

Travel to China and onto North Korea


https://forum.unlock.org.uk/Topic24523.aspx

By Cory1971 - 11 Apr 17 9:48 PM

Anyone any knowledge of travelling into China then onto North Korea whilst on SOR
By JASB - 30 Aug 19 4:29 PM

Yankee - 28 Aug 18 6:23 PM
Monkos - 28 Aug 18 1:13 PM
Yankee - 19 Apr 17 8:43 AM
Deb S - 19 Apr 17 7:55 AM
Yankee - 18 Apr 17 8:08 AM
Cory1971 - 11 Apr 17 9:48 PM
Anyone any knowledge of travelling into China then onto North Korea whilst on SOR

Isn't the question even simpler - anyone got any knowledge of travelling to North Korea, period??

Hi Cory and Yankee

Most people travelling to China will require a visa. The visa application form asks

'Do you have any criminal record in China or any other country'?

There is very little guidance as to what the Chinese consider you should disclose. The Embassy states that disclosure of a conviction would not automatically stop you from getting a visa but that you should answer the question honestly so that you do not risk being turned away on arrival at the border or expelled after entry. 

We have little information about travel to North Korea. However offences that would be considered trivial in other countries can incur really severe penalties in North Korea, particularly those which the authorities deem to be disrespectful towards the North Korean leadership or government. 

The other thing to consider if you are travelling whilst on the SOR is that your passport is likely to be 'flagged' which will alert authorities the authorities in China and North Korea that you have been cautioned or convicted of a sexual offence. A caller to our helpline recently was given permission by his PPU officer to travel to the Philippines but was immediately put back on a flight to the UK by immigration in the Philippines.

Hope this helps.

Debs  




Debs - the police are meant to take a risk based approach when determining whether to notify a foreign country (outside the EU) if a traveller is on the SOR (or ViSOR for other violet offences). If they decide to notify, it is meant to be via an Interpol green notice, although there is some anecdotal evidence of embassy-to-embassy sharing of intel for serious offenders. For his passport to be flagged in the Philippines, it must have been recorded on the Philippines own watch list and the information must have come from another source. The fact that he needed permission from his PPU officer implies he had other travel restrictions or was under a SOPO? That would suggest a different risk category.  There are plenty of positive examples in other threads on the forums of people on the SOR travelling without a problem to other non-EU countries - this implies they are either low risk and no information shared about them, or Interpol notices/information shared but simply not updated on the host countries' border systems.

No problem going to China with a visa as long as you don't tick the disclose convitcion box on the application form - and I think it's perfectly reasonable not to disclose when doing so could you put at risk in such a country. Lawyers, PPUs and the people behind Unlock might never advise you not to disclose as they'd be in a bit of trouble if they did. But really the advise should be, don't disclose if there's no justifiable reason to.

OK if you don't have to notify.  If you do, it depends on the attitude of your PPU and whether they issue a green notice or not .....  The dilemma is that part of your PPU risk assessment includes evidence that you are committed to rehabilitation. Notifying them you are going to travel to a country where they know you will be asked about criminal records implies that you are prepared to play loose with the truth ...... 

Hi
Please see my article of "how do you prove you are a low risk".
Just a bit of a back ground to show relevance follows sorry.. lol
In brief I am a first offender (now ex-offender), a low risk and extremely unlikely to reoffend, very rarely visited and most of my SOPO conditions been removed.
I have an issue removing the final 2 which no one can qualify why I have them. the only response I receive is "prove you are not a risk", but will not tell or guide me how I am to do this.
Relevance:
I mention this because I would advise you to research the countries embassy sites, keep a record of events and documents rising from your research/discussions and ask the PPU what notification actions they will take.

I lost money on a trip I was going on and could not claim it back. My only happiness was proving the PPU had not been truthful in their actions to a Judge.

Good luck and hopefully your journeys will go past the UK's borders.