+xHey Thanks for your post and clsryifjng my points.I really appreciate that.Something I couldn’t clarify from your post was the following If a job was advertised and I ticked NO on the application form to having convictions that are SPENT and they did not ask me to disclose spent convictions under the ROA.If they subsequently run a standard check and see the SPENT convictions on there which they will and then dismiss me for lying or dishonesty even though I didn’t need to disclose SPENT convictions could I have a claim against the employer?Thanks
The disclosure question should be based on the level of check being done, which is the first clue. They can't just decide what level of check they want to do if it's a higher level than they are allowed. If you don't disclose something that they have a right to see, they may well withdraw the job offer or terminate the employment. If they do a higher level of check than they are allowed, you can challenge it with the DBS before it is issued, or after the certificate is issued, you can argue that they are not entitled to the information and have broken data protection law. The first way is probably better.