Hi everyone,I wanted to share some critical information I have just uncovered regarding starting an independent business while managing a sensitive criminal record. Like many here, I am setting up as a solo trader and had to decide whether to operate as a Sole Trader or register a Limited Company.My conviction happened under a previous surname (relating to historic conduct from when I was a child, though prosecuted as an adult). Because of this, my primary concern was privacy. If my old surname is linked to my new business on a public index, a quick Google search destroys my rehabilitation and puts my livelihood in jeopardy.I reached out to Unlock, ViSOR, and ultimately pushed a query directly to the New Companies Team at Companies House to get definitive legal clarity.What I discovered is a massive, incredibly unfair loophole where UK Corporate Law completely contradicts and overrides the protections of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act (ROA).The Concrete Facts from Companies House After pressing them for a direct answer on the legislation, an Operational Officer from Companies House confirmed the following:1. It is strictly mandatory to disclose past names: Under The Companies (Particulars of Directors) Regulations 1972, any director registering a Limited Company must disclose any former surnames held within the last 20 years. Knowingly omitting a former name is a criminal offence.2. The disclosure automatically goes public: Companies House confirmed that standard data captured on the IN01 incorporation format (the former name section) is inherently and automatically pushed straight to the public online register.3. They will not hide it for rehabilitation reasons: Their system is hardcoded to publish this data. They explicitly stated that they do not have a mechanism or a policy to withhold or protect a former surname from the public-facing register due to sensitive criminal records or rehabilitation circumstances.The Systemic ContradictionThis creates a devastating barrier for rehabilitated people trying to better themselves through business ownership:• The Rehabilitation of Offenders Act is designed to give us a clean slate so a past record doesn't permanently ruin our future.• The Companies Act, however, prioritizes absolute corporate transparency.Because corporate law wins this battle, registering a Limited Company effectively forces you to publish your old identity to the public internet, completely stripping away your right to privacy and a fresh start.What this means for anyone starting a business:If you have a past record tied to a previous surname (e.g., a maiden name, a name changed by deed poll, etc.) and you want to maintain your privacy:• DO NOT register a Limited Company. Your old name will be indexed on Google via Companies House, and anyone searching your business or your name will find it.• DO register as a Sole Trader instead. When you operate as a sole trader, your business registration is entirely private between you and HMRC. HMRC is bound by strict statutory privacy laws and never publishes your information to a public registry. Your clients and the general public will only ever see your current name or trading name.While the Sole Trader route is a safe, completely legal workaround for now, it feels like a temporary band-aid. If any of our businesses grow to a point where we need to transition to a Limited Company for tax efficiency or growth, the current system forces us to choose between keeping our businesses small or sacrificing our privacy.I hope this breakdown prevents someone from accidentally exposing their past identity on a public register. Hopefully, Unlock's policy team can use structural barriers like this to keep lobbying the government for a genuine right to be forgotten in corporate law.Best of luck to everyone trying to build a future.