﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>theForum » Looking for employment » Employers practices and policies » Misleading questions on application forms  » "Do you have any unspent convictions, cautions, reprimands or warnings?"</title><generator>InstantForum 2016-2 Final</generator><description>theForum</description><link>https://forum.unlock.org.uk/</link><webMaster>theForum</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 22:30:43 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>"Do you have any unspent convictions, cautions, reprimands or warnings?"</title><link>https://forum.unlock.org.uk/FindPost22155.aspx</link><description>...for an office-based editing job in a newspaper? Surely they would only be able to conduct a Basic check which would not reveal any cautions or reprimands (even cautions exempt from filtering) - right?</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2016 11:27:53 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Simon1081</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: "Do you have any unspent convictions, cautions, reprimands or warnings?"</title><link>https://forum.unlock.org.uk/FindPost22156.aspx</link><description>&lt;div data-id="22155" class="if-quote-wrapper" unselectable="on" data-guid="1472379700581"&gt;&lt;a class="quote-para" unselectable="on" style="display: none;" href="#" data-id="22155" title="Move Cursor Below" contenteditable="false"&gt;&lt;span unselectable="on"&gt;+&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a class="quote-delete" unselectable="on" style="display: none;" href="#" data-id="22155" title="Delete Quote" contenteditable="false"&gt;&lt;span unselectable="on"&gt;x&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span unselectable="on" class="quote-markup"&gt;[quote]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div unselectable="on" class="if-quote-header" contenteditable="false"&gt;&lt;div unselectable="on" class="if-quote-toggle-wrapper"&gt;&lt;a class="if-quote-toggle quote-link" href="#" data-id="22155" title=" "&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;span unselectable="on" class="quote-markup"&gt;[b]&lt;/span&gt;Simon1081 - 27 Aug 16 8:50 PM&lt;span unselectable="on" class="quote-markup"&gt;[/b]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="if-quote-message if-quote-message-22155"&gt;&lt;div class="if-quote-message-margin"&gt;...for an office-based editing job in a newspaper? Surely they would only be able to conduct a Basic check which would not reveal any cautions or reprimands (even cautions exempt from filtering) - right?&lt;a class="if-quote-goto quote-link" href="#" data-id="22155"&gt;&lt;span class="goto"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;span class="quote-markup"&gt;[/quote]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You're correct. As I guess you know, cautions are spent immediately so to put that in the same sentence as "unspent" shows they don't know much about the law. Cautions will only show up in a standard or enhanced check, not a basic one.&amp;nbsp;If they were doing a standard or enhanced check they would ask you about ALL convictions, so this is almost certainly a basic check they are doing - the only one that this kind of job is allowed to do as it is not exempt from the ROA.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Hopefully this can be put down simply to the person in HR designing the question not knowing anything about the ROA and cautions.</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2016 11:27:53 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>BenS</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>