﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>theForum » Information on the internet » The Google effect  » New EU ruling re: Google de-listings</title><generator>InstantForum 2016-2 Final</generator><description>theForum</description><link>https://forum.unlock.org.uk/</link><webMaster>theForum</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 05:49:11 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>New EU ruling re: Google de-listings</title><link>https://forum.unlock.org.uk/FindPost26464.aspx</link><description>In a ruling yesterday, the EU confirmed that Google do not have to de-list search results for Google sites outside the EU such as Google.com unless they are being accessed from within the EU. So even if Google agree to de-list after your request, will still be visible in non-EU countries if that is a concern for anyone.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;More importantly, in a second judgement not as widely reported, there were some worrying comments on interpretation which of course leave it up to Google to determine the balance between freedom of information and privacy. The new information is that search results push down through time. This helps on the default Google screen ('All' results) but won't help at all if anyone clicks on the 'News' tab - while you can do a lot of work yourself to get more positive links displayed, it's very hard to get them to appear in the News section.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="1" face="Arial"&gt;The court also issued a related second ruling, which said that links do not automatically have to be removed just because they contain information about a person's sex life or a criminal conviction.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"&gt;Instead, it ruled that such listings could be kept where "strictly necessary" for people's freedom of information rights to be preserved. However, it indicated a high threshold should be applied and that such results should fall down search result listings over time.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"&gt;"The obligation to demote search results in some cases is particularly interesting as an example of the courts directly interfering with the algorithms used by big tech companies," commented Peter Church from the law firm Linklaters.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;Link to full article here&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-49808208"&gt;BBC News&lt;/a&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 10:27:23 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Yankee</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: New EU ruling re: Google de-listings</title><link>https://forum.unlock.org.uk/FindPost26678.aspx</link><description>&lt;div data-id="26477" class="if-quote-wrapper" unselectable="on" data-guid="1575887138942"&gt;&lt;a class="quote-para" unselectable="on" style="display: none;" href="#" data-id="26477" title="Move Cursor Below" contenteditable="false"&gt;&lt;span unselectable="on"&gt;+&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a class="quote-delete" unselectable="on" style="display: none;" href="#" data-id="26477" title="Delete Quote" contenteditable="false"&gt;&lt;span unselectable="on"&gt;x&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span unselectable="on" class="quote-markup"&gt;[quote]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div unselectable="on" class="if-quote-header" contenteditable="false"&gt;&lt;div unselectable="on" class="if-quote-toggle-wrapper"&gt;&lt;a class="if-quote-toggle quote-link" href="#" data-id="26477" title=" "&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;span unselectable="on" class="quote-markup"&gt;[b]&lt;/span&gt;Mr W - 30 Sep 19 12:30 AM&lt;span unselectable="on" class="quote-markup"&gt;[/b]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="if-quote-message if-quote-message-26477"&gt;&lt;div class="if-quote-message-margin"&gt;Has anyone got any positive stories about being de-listed? I'd be interested to hear them.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I'm hoping to go on holiday outside of the EU in the not too distant future, so I might check to see how results for me differ, if at all.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;A side note for those interested - my court story was in the press and those stories come up first because I have an unusual name. This story about "The Google effect" prompted me to have a go at trying to get Google to de-list those links about me as my suspended sentence is finished. (The joys of an SHPO keep me "unspent" though so I wasn't hopeful but I thought I should give it a go). Google responded within a few days. Some of the links have fallen off Google results (hurrah!) but the newspaper stories will all remain, and will, of course, remain on the 'news' section as well as 'All results', here is the response:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;"It is Google’s understanding that the information about you on this/these URLs - with regard to all the circumstances of the case we are aware of - is still relevant in relation to the purposes of data processing, and therefore the reference to this document in our search results is justified by the public interest.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;At this time, Google has decided not to take action on these URLs."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Not quite sure what "relevant in relation to the purposes of data processing" means but I thought I'd share anyway.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a class="if-quote-goto quote-link" href="#" data-id="26477"&gt;&lt;span class="goto"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;span class="quote-markup"&gt;[/quote]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You can use a web site called &lt;strong&gt;isearchfrom&lt;/strong&gt; to see foreign search results. But, the software itself is no longer updated as of 3 years ago (but that shouldn't matter as I suppose, as it enacts the actual searches from abroad today).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 10:27:23 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Harmless</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: New EU ruling re: Google de-listings</title><link>https://forum.unlock.org.uk/FindPost26677.aspx</link><description>&lt;div data-id="26477" class="if-quote-wrapper" unselectable="on" data-guid="1575886462164"&gt;&lt;a class="quote-para" unselectable="on" style="display: none;" href="#" data-id="26477" title="Move Cursor Below" contenteditable="false"&gt;&lt;span unselectable="on"&gt;+&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a class="quote-delete" unselectable="on" style="display: none;" href="#" data-id="26477" title="Delete Quote" contenteditable="false"&gt;&lt;span unselectable="on"&gt;x&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span unselectable="on" class="quote-markup"&gt;[quote]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div unselectable="on" class="if-quote-header" contenteditable="false"&gt;&lt;div unselectable="on" class="if-quote-toggle-wrapper"&gt;&lt;a class="if-quote-toggle quote-link" href="#" data-id="26477" title=" "&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;span unselectable="on" class="quote-markup"&gt;[b]&lt;/span&gt;Mr W - 30 Sep 19 12:30 AM&lt;span unselectable="on" class="quote-markup"&gt;[/b]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="if-quote-message if-quote-message-26477"&gt;&lt;div class="if-quote-message-margin"&gt;Has anyone got any positive stories about being de-listed? I'd be interested to hear them.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I'm hoping to go on holiday outside of the EU in the not too distant future, so I might check to see how results for me differ, if at all.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;A side note for those interested - my court story was in the press and those stories come up first because I have an unusual name. This story about "The Google effect" prompted me to have a go at trying to get Google to de-list those links about me as my suspended sentence is finished. (The joys of an SHPO keep me "unspent" though so I wasn't hopeful but I thought I should give it a go). Google responded within a few days. Some of the links have fallen off Google results (hurrah!) but the newspaper stories will all remain, and will, of course, remain on the 'news' section as well as 'All results', here is the response:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;"It is Google’s understanding that the information about you on this/these URLs - with regard to all the circumstances of the case we are aware of - is still relevant in relation to the purposes of data processing, and therefore the reference to this document in our search results is justified by the public interest.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;At this time, Google has decided not to take action on these URLs."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Not quite sure what "relevant in relation to the purposes of data processing" means but I thought I'd share anyway.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a class="if-quote-goto quote-link" href="#" data-id="26477"&gt;&lt;span class="goto"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;span class="quote-markup"&gt;[/quote]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I have a success story re The Google Effect ,but not with de-listing&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a href="https://forum.unlock.org.uk/Topic26615.aspx?Keywords=ruling%20re:%20Google%20de-listings"&gt;https://forum.unlock.org.uk/Topic26615.aspx?Keywords=ruling%20re:%20Google%20de-listings&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Words of hope - sometimes the news site reorganises, and the story loses its "news" status, and therefore its "buoyancy" in search results generally, coming after "Facebook results for John Smith", "John Smith on Twitter" etc etc.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;When that happens, you can bomb the internet with phoney items bearing your name "Your Name: The Blog", "Your name.Com" etc etc etc, and get the story off page 1.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 10:21:36 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Harmless</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: New EU ruling re: Google de-listings</title><link>https://forum.unlock.org.uk/FindPost26481.aspx</link><description>&lt;div data-id="26477" class="if-quote-wrapper" unselectable="on" data-guid="1569918869316"&gt;&lt;a class="quote-para" unselectable="on" style="display: none;" href="#" data-id="26477" title="Move Cursor Below" contenteditable="false"&gt;&lt;span unselectable="on"&gt;+&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a class="quote-delete" unselectable="on" style="display: none;" href="#" data-id="26477" title="Delete Quote" contenteditable="false"&gt;&lt;span unselectable="on"&gt;x&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span unselectable="on" class="quote-markup"&gt;[quote]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div unselectable="on" class="if-quote-header" contenteditable="false"&gt;&lt;div unselectable="on" class="if-quote-toggle-wrapper"&gt;&lt;a class="if-quote-toggle quote-link" href="#" data-id="26477" title=" "&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;span unselectable="on" class="quote-markup"&gt;[b]&lt;/span&gt;Mr W - 30 Sep 19 12:30 AM&lt;span unselectable="on" class="quote-markup"&gt;[/b]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="if-quote-message if-quote-message-26477"&gt;&lt;div class="if-quote-message-margin"&gt;Has anyone got any positive stories about being de-listed? I'd be interested to hear them.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I'm hoping to go on holiday outside of the EU in the not too distant future, so I might check to see how results for me differ, if at all.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;A side note for those interested - my court story was in the press and those stories come up first because I have an unusual name. This story about "The Google effect" prompted me to have a go at trying to get Google to de-list those links about me as my suspended sentence is finished. (The joys of an SHPO keep me "unspent" though so I wasn't hopeful but I thought I should give it a go). Google responded within a few days. Some of the links have fallen off Google results (hurrah!) but the newspaper stories will all remain, and will, of course, remain on the 'news' section as well as 'All results', here is the response:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;"It is Google’s understanding that the information about you on this/these URLs - with regard to all the circumstances of the case we are aware of - is still relevant in relation to the purposes of data processing, and therefore the reference to this document in our search results is justified by the public interest.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;At this time, Google has decided not to take action on these URLs."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Not quite sure what "relevant in relation to the purposes of data processing" means but I thought I'd share anyway.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a class="if-quote-goto quote-link" href="#" data-id="26477"&gt;&lt;span class="goto"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;span class="quote-markup"&gt;[/quote]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There are some positive stories about this in Unlock's magazine, &lt;a href="http://www.the-record.org.uk/"&gt;the Record&lt;/a&gt;. Go to the website, and put "Google" in the search box. There are a few successes.&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;:)&lt;/span&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 09:37:32 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>AB2014</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: New EU ruling re: Google de-listings</title><link>https://forum.unlock.org.uk/FindPost26477.aspx</link><description>Has anyone got any positive stories about being de-listed? I'd be interested to hear them.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I'm hoping to go on holiday outside of the EU in the not too distant future, so I might check to see how results for me differ, if at all. &lt;strong&gt;EDIT: &lt;/strong&gt;Back from holiday - No different.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;A side note for those interested - my court story was in the press and those stories come up first because I have an unusual name. This story about "The Google effect" prompted me to have a go at trying to get Google to de-list those links about me as my suspended sentence is finished. (The joys of an SHPO keep me "unspent" though so I wasn't hopeful but I thought I should give it a go). Google responded within a few days. Some of the links have fallen off Google results (hurrah!) but the newspaper stories will all remain, and will, of course, remain on the 'news' section as well as 'All results', here is the response:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;"It is Google’s understanding that the information about you on this/these URLs - with regard to all the circumstances of the case we are aware of - is still relevant in relation to the purposes of data processing, and therefore the reference to this document in our search results is justified by the public interest.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;At this time, Google has decided not to take action on these URLs."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Not quite sure what "relevant in relation to the purposes of data processing" means but I thought I'd share anyway.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:30:26 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Mr W</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: New EU ruling re: Google de-listings</title><link>https://forum.unlock.org.uk/FindPost26476.aspx</link><description>&lt;div data-id="26464" class="if-quote-wrapper" unselectable="on" data-guid="1569752550734"&gt;&lt;a class="quote-para" unselectable="on" style="display: none;" href="#" data-id="26464" title="Move Cursor Below" contenteditable="false"&gt;&lt;span unselectable="on"&gt;+&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a class="quote-delete" unselectable="on" style="display: none;" href="#" data-id="26464" title="Delete Quote" contenteditable="false"&gt;&lt;span unselectable="on"&gt;x&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span unselectable="on" class="quote-markup"&gt;[quote]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div unselectable="on" class="if-quote-header" contenteditable="false"&gt;&lt;div unselectable="on" class="if-quote-toggle-wrapper"&gt;&lt;a class="if-quote-toggle quote-link" href="#" data-id="26464" title=" "&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;span unselectable="on" class="quote-markup"&gt;[b]&lt;/span&gt;Yankee - 25 Sep 19 9:22 AM&lt;span unselectable="on" class="quote-markup"&gt;[/b]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="if-quote-message if-quote-message-26464"&gt;&lt;div class="if-quote-message-margin"&gt;In a ruling yesterday, the EU confirmed that Google do not have to de-list search results for Google sites outside the EU such as Google.com unless they are being accessed from within the EU. So even if Google agree to de-list after your request, will still be visible in non-EU countries if that is a concern for anyone.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;More importantly, in a second judgement not as widely reported, there were some worrying comments on interpretation which of course leave it up to Google to determine the balance between freedom of information and privacy. The new information is that search results push down through time. This helps on the default Google screen ('All' results) but won't help at all if anyone clicks on the 'News' tab - while you can do a lot of work yourself to get more positive links displayed, it's very hard to get them to appear in the News section.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="1" face="Arial"&gt;The court also issued a related second ruling, which said that links do not automatically have to be removed just because they contain information about a person's sex life or a criminal conviction.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"&gt;Instead, it ruled that such listings could be kept where "strictly necessary" for people's freedom of information rights to be preserved. However, it indicated a high threshold should be applied and that such results should fall down search result listings over time.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"&gt;"The obligation to demote search results in some cases is particularly interesting as an example of the courts directly interfering with the algorithms used by big tech companies," commented Peter Church from the law firm Linklaters.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;Link to full article here&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-49808208"&gt;BBC News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a class="if-quote-goto quote-link" href="#" data-id="26464"&gt;&lt;span class="goto"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;span class="quote-markup"&gt;[/quote]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br/&gt;That is a worrying ruling. Google already implements US copyright laws in other countries, so there is a precedance. This has nothing to do with authorative regimes. There is already guidance to prevent that sort of abuse of power. If the information can be proven to be excessive, inaccurate or outdated,&amp;nbsp; then there us no reason why those search results should be viewed outside of the EU. EU citizens travel too of course, and EU citizens privacy should be respected.&amp;nbsp;</description><pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2019 11:28:13 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Zack</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>