﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>theForum » General Information » Current affairs and general news  » New recall rules</title><generator>InstantForum 2016-2 Final</generator><description>theForum</description><link>https://forum.unlock.org.uk/</link><webMaster>theForum</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 20:03:57 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>New recall rules</title><link>https://forum.unlock.org.uk/FindPost35456.aspx</link><description>There is a bit of confusion over this. The statement about who will be excluded from the new 28 day fixed recall rule was rather vague.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Some offenders will be excluded from this measure…&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;span style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Including any offender who has been recalled for committing a serious further offence.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We also exclude those who are subject to higher levels of risk management by multiple agencies, where the police, prisons and probation services work together. "&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In the media it has been reported that SO and domestic abusers will NOT be excluded.&amp;nbsp; In a TV interview, one minister said.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;blockquote style="background-repeat: no-repeat; box-sizing: inherit; padding: 0px 0px 0px 1em; margin: 0px; border-left: 0.2em solid rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.15); color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.9); font-family: Lato; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: justify; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; background-color: rgb(255, 248, 225); text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial;"&gt;&lt;em style="background-repeat: no-repeat; box-sizing: inherit; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;"&gt;“No, it won’t apply to sexual offenders and domestic abusers. It won’t apply to the most dangerous criminals.”&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Bu they had to be told that this was in fact wrong. Only terrorists and those at highest-risk of committing serious offences are exempt from Mahmood’s rule change.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;Reading the original statement again, it seems to refer to MAPPA, but there are multiple levels of MAPPA. All SO are under MAPPA but mostly at level one. There are two higher MAPPA levels as well, which could include terrorists (level 3) and some, but not all domestic abusers (level 2).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So we do not know if MAPPA level 1 are excluded or not.</description><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 12:22:36 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>punter99</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: New recall rules</title><link>https://forum.unlock.org.uk/FindPost35459.aspx</link><description>Well well well, I'll be blown:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;[quote]&lt;br/&gt;Excluded will be people sentenced to more than four years; people recalled for committing serious further offences; and high-risk violent or sexual offenders monitored under levels 2 and 3 of MAPPA (Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements). However, some people convicted of sexual offences or domestic violence stand to benefit from the scheme, unlike previous Government emergency early release schemes which excluded them.&lt;br/&gt;[/quote]&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This does in fact seem to be quite clear that, MAPPA Level 1 offenders who are not serving over four years and haven't committed a "serious further offence" will be eligible for only 28-day recalls.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This is a small, albeit very encouraging change of stance from Government that I welcome. For far too long there has been "branding" and "tarring" groups of people with convictions, that serves no real purpose, does not contribute to "public protection", and actively goes against stated policy of allowing people to rehabilitate and move forward in their lives.</description><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 12:22:36 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Evan Davis</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: New recall rules</title><link>https://forum.unlock.org.uk/FindPost35458.aspx</link><description>The Government press release (&lt;a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/lord-chancellor-and-moj-permanent-secretary-prison-capacity-press-conference)"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/lord-chancellor-and-moj-permanent-secretary-prison-capacity-press-conference)"&gt;https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/lord-chancellor-and-moj-permanent-secretary-prison-capacity-press-conference)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt; says this:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;[quote]&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;We will bring legislation in the coming weeks that means those serving sentences of between one and four years can only be returned to prison for a fixed, 28-day period.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some offenders will be excluded from this measure…&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Including any offender who has been recalled for committing a serious further offence.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We also exclude those who are subject to higher levels of risk management by multiple agencies, where the police, prisons and probation services work together.&amp;nbsp; [/quote]&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Given how Ministers tend to think of late, my own personal reading of this was that this would exclude anyone subject to MAPPA (Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements), which would include anyone convicted of a sexual offence and also anyone convicted of a violent offence listed in Schedule 15B. However, in theory I suppose, it could only apply to those on "higher" levels of MAPPA - MAPPA Level 2+3, for example. (not to be confused with Category)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I will see over the coming weeks if I can discover any further, more concrete information, because I certainly agree with [b]AB2014[/b] that this statement is somewhat confusing, but is likely intentionally vague (maybe because final policy hasn't been formulated yet?). I'll update on this thread if any further information comes to light.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 18:47:18 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Evan Davis</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: New recall rules</title><link>https://forum.unlock.org.uk/FindPost35457.aspx</link><description>&lt;div data-id="35456" class="if-quote-wrapper" unselectable="on" data-guid="1747303543081"&gt;&lt;a class="quote-para" unselectable="on" style="display: none;" href="#" data-id="35456" title="Move Cursor Below" contenteditable="false"&gt;&lt;span unselectable="on"&gt;+&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a class="quote-delete" unselectable="on" style="display: none;" href="#" data-id="35456" title="Delete Quote" contenteditable="false"&gt;&lt;span unselectable="on"&gt;x&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span unselectable="on" class="quote-markup"&gt;[quote]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div unselectable="on" class="if-quote-header" contenteditable="false"&gt;&lt;div unselectable="on" class="if-quote-toggle-wrapper"&gt;&lt;a class="if-quote-toggle quote-link" href="#" data-id="35456" title=" "&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;span unselectable="on" class="quote-markup"&gt;[b]&lt;/span&gt;punter99 - 15 May 25 10:51 AM&lt;span unselectable="on" class="quote-markup"&gt;[/b]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="if-quote-message if-quote-message-35456"&gt;&lt;div class="if-quote-message-margin"&gt;There is a bit of confusion over this. The statement about who will be excluded from the new 28 day fixed recall rule was rather vague.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Some offenders will be excluded from this measure…&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;span style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Including any offender who has been recalled for committing a serious further offence.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We also exclude those who are subject to higher levels of risk management by multiple agencies, where the police, prisons and probation services work together. "&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In the media it has been reported that SO and domestic abusers will NOT be excluded.&amp;nbsp; In a TV interview, one minister said.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote style="background-repeat: no-repeat; box-sizing: inherit; padding: 0px 0px 0px 1em; margin: 0px; border-left: 0.2em solid rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.15); color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.9); font-family: Lato; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: justify; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; background-color: rgb(255, 248, 225); text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial;"&gt;&lt;em style="background-repeat: no-repeat; box-sizing: inherit; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;"&gt;“No, it won’t apply to sexual offenders and domestic abusers. It won’t apply to the most dangerous criminals.”&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Bu they had to be told that this was in fact wrong. Only terrorists and those at highest-risk of committing serious offences are exempt from Mahmood’s rule change.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;Reading the original statement again, it seems to refer to MAPPA, but there are multiple levels of MAPPA. All SO are under MAPPA but mostly at level one. There are two higher MAPPA levels as well, which could include terrorists (level 3) and some, but not all domestic abusers (level 2).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So we do not know if MAPPA level 1 are excluded or not.&lt;a class="if-quote-goto quote-link" href="#" data-id="35456"&gt;&lt;span class="goto"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;span class="quote-markup"&gt;[/quote]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Anyone on the SOR released from prison in this way would be managed by probation and the police, which means they are managed by mulitiple agencies. So, they're not specifically excluded, but they are still excluded if the first statement is true. As ministers in general don't understand how the system works, I can see how this would cause confusion, and how people commenting on it would interpret it differently because of that and because of their own agenda. Ministers failing to understand the whole system from start to finish is why the rehabilitation part doesn't work.</description><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 12:10:08 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>AB2014</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>