Sorry. i misunderstood your point. I read it as if they can remove WSC overnight, why can they not remove right to be forgotten links just as quickly.
I've got a very good case for RTBF. Because of an almighty FUBAR by the CPS barrister, they read out in open court what the police originally arrested me for. There was never ever any evidence for that (mainly because it wasn't true.). As court reporting is a qualified privilege the local papers have no obligation to correct it as it is not legally libelous, resulting in people Googling me "finding" that I have apparently committed far more serious offences. I have a good case for delisting, but the papers would then be entitled to publish a follow up explaining that the links had been removed.
However, I've chosen the path of not invoking the Streisand Effect!