theForum is run by the charity Unlock. We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions but we may intervene and take any action as we think necessary. Further details can be found in our terms of use. If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report-a-post button or email us at forum@unlock.org.uk.


Plan to travel on an ESTA having previously held a VISA?


Plan to travel on an ESTA having previously held a VISA?

Author
Message
J23
J23
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (105 reputation)Supreme Being (105 reputation)Supreme Being (105 reputation)Supreme Being (105 reputation)Supreme Being (105 reputation)Supreme Being (105 reputation)Supreme Being (105 reputation)Supreme Being (105 reputation)Supreme Being (105 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2, Visits: 5
In 2014 I travelled to the US on a non-immigrant holiday visa - I was granted a 10 year VISA, which is technically still in date but on a passport that has expired and I no longer have.

I believe that I never really needed a VISA, so I applied for an ESTA for my forthcoming trip, which I have been granted.

I was cautioned for criminal damage (under £500 - private property) in 2006.

I am now concerned that when I go through US Border Patrol and get fingerprinted, it is going to alert staff of my previous trip to the US on the VISA (technically still in date) 

If Border Patrol ask me about why I had a VISA (and now don't have one) what do I say? 

I am very anxious about the situation, but genuinely believe I can honestly say that I have not been convicted of a crime that would rule me out of an ESTA. Looking at the list of crimes of moral turpitude I don't believe this fits the bill

Your advice and thoughts are extremely welcome. Should I apply for a VISA?
AB2014
AB2014
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (164K reputation)Supreme Being (164K reputation)Supreme Being (164K reputation)Supreme Being (164K reputation)Supreme Being (164K reputation)Supreme Being (164K reputation)Supreme Being (164K reputation)Supreme Being (164K reputation)Supreme Being (164K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.1K, Visits: 7K
J23 - 11 Jul 23 11:48 AM
In 2014 I travelled to the US on a non-immigrant holiday visa - I was granted a 10 year VISA, which is technically still in date but on a passport that has expired and I no longer have.

I believe that I never really needed a VISA, so I applied for an ESTA for my forthcoming trip, which I have been granted.

I was cautioned for criminal damage (under £500 - private property) in 2006.

I am now concerned that when I go through US Border Patrol and get fingerprinted, it is going to alert staff of my previous trip to the US on the VISA (technically still in date) 

If Border Patrol ask me about why I had a VISA (and now don't have one) what do I say? 

I am very anxious about the situation, but genuinely believe I can honestly say that I have not been convicted of a crime that would rule me out of an ESTA. Looking at the list of crimes of moral turpitude I don't believe this fits the bill

Your advice and thoughts are extremely welcome. Should I apply for a VISA?

Well, if you don't have the passport anymore, you can't use it, obviously. However, if you disclosed your caution for the previous visa then they already know about it, so that might be an issue, but if it is an issue, why did they give you an ESTA? It sounds like you weren't arrested for an offence that resulted in serious harm to property, so it might be that they have seen your record and are OK with you having an ESTA this time. Having said that, you have a valid visa in your name, just not in your current passport. You could always email the embassy and ask them what to do, as if you comply with what they say, they can't hold that against you. They might say you have to transfer the visa to the new passport, but it should still be easier and quicker than making a new application, as you shouldn't need an interview.

=========================================================================================================

If you are to punish a man retributively you must injure him. If you are to reform him you must improve him. And men are not improved by injuries. (George Bernard Shaw)

GO


Similar Topics


As a small but national charity, we rely on charitable grants and individual donations to continue running theForum. We do not deliver government services. By being independent, we are able to respond to the needs of the people with convictions. Help us keep theForum going.

Donate Online

Login
Existing Account
Email Address:


Password:


Select a Forum....
























































































































































































theForum


Search