theForum is run by the charity Unlock. We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions but we may intervene and take any action as we think necessary. Further details can be found in our terms of use. If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report-a-post button or email us at forum@unlock.org.uk.


R vs Dewey 2024 and SHPOs


R vs Dewey 2024 and SHPOs

Author
Message
JASB
JASB
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (347K reputation)Supreme Being (347K reputation)Supreme Being (347K reputation)Supreme Being (347K reputation)Supreme Being (347K reputation)Supreme Being (347K reputation)Supreme Being (347K reputation)Supreme Being (347K reputation)Supreme Being (347K reputation)

Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 1.2K, Visits: 1.8K
punter99 - 19 Mar 26 11:02 AM
https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/664e39da8731331589610935

This is a fairly recent case, involving SHPOs and the infamous no contact clause, that is automatically included in many cases.
It is more specific than the Smith ruling from 2011 and may be useful in arguing for an SHPO to be amended.

Hi
Good to see your support for others as always.

Society suggests I must let go of all my expectations but I disagree, as whilst I have a voice, I have hope.

Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope is for tomorrow else what is left if you remove a mans hope.
------------------------------

This forum supports these words, thank you Unlock and your contributors.

punter99
punter99
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (246K reputation)Supreme Being (246K reputation)Supreme Being (246K reputation)Supreme Being (246K reputation)Supreme Being (246K reputation)Supreme Being (246K reputation)Supreme Being (246K reputation)Supreme Being (246K reputation)Supreme Being (246K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 883, Visits: 7.3K
https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/664e39da8731331589610935

This is a fairly recent case, involving SHPOs and the infamous no contact clause, that is automatically included in many cases.
It is more specific than the Smith ruling from 2011 and may be useful in arguing for an SHPO to be amended.
GO


Similar Topics


As a small but national charity, we rely on charitable grants and individual donations to continue running theForum. We do not deliver government services. By being independent, we are able to respond to the needs of the people with convictions. Help us keep theForum going.

Donate Online

Login
Existing Account
Email Address:


Password:


Select a Forum....
























































































































































































theForum


Search