Pretty much all my friends have vanished off the face of the earth which I've accepted and come to terms with.

That's sad and, of course, I completely empathise. Did you manage to speak to any friend who didn't see the press first? Did you see any differences in regard to how people found out? For example, people you spoke to versus people who found out from the press? And do you feel you could have saved more friendships?

=====
Fighting or Accepting - its difficult to know which is right and when.

Hi
You know we have openly talked previously on many topics and so know I talk from a "positive self help" perspective. In brief you must now start to fully concentrate on believing yourself; and so appreciating all the qualities you have. I often say that you must forgive and understand yourself first before intentionally trying to appease the "whims of others". Yes I say whims because I am in no doubt that previous to your offence, "others" have instigated comments or acted in a manner that was inappropriate, and with disregard for the subjective morals of "societies". Now they wish to stand as if they have always defended those "morals" and so distract "society" from remembering their own mistakes. This stance is always accompanied by their chastising (bullying) and alienation (hiding from or denying knowledge of) for the sole purpose of maintaining their "status" or "like" in society; facebook / twitter world. Remember you have found and lost friends/relationships prior to your offence and survived; you will do so now.

It is in my experience that when we first comprehend the consequences of our actions; no matter how severe, we are like a child fighting for the love and attention of a unresponsive parent or partner. We plead, yell - though sometimes silently, become paranoid about others feelings to us or with just simple everyday human interactions. This is natural due to the emotional trauma we are / have been in the middle of.

Have you ever asked why the PPU do not announce their visits or generally ask the same type of questions as in your interview when arrested? It is not necessarily because they hope to catch you out or doing something, it is because they want you to revisit the emotional trauma of the arrest and interview! It is your self belief that ensures you manage and turn these emotions to present the viewer's perception of you in a positive way. As your confidence grows this will become easier for you yet more challenging to those trying to compare you to the perceived character described in their file.

Consider now that instead of the scenario described being the PPU, it is someone you meet; be they known or not known previously to you. You will be asked questions by either type of meeting. I repeat my words "It is your self belief that ensures you manage and turn these emotions to present the viewer's perception of you in a positive way. As your confidence grows this will become easier for you yet more challenging to those trying to compare you to a perceived character". 

Use the challengers you have recently been through, the lessons learned from the way you have approached making declarations. Consider if you; because of emotional trauma, disclose to easily or provide unnecessary details; after all you are not on trial. You understand your conditions so plan your social and relationship lives with them in mind BUT NOT derived from them.

Only you know the challenges you have actually overcome since your offence. The decisions - right or wrong - you have made and learned from. Your psychological self control mechanisms have developed or been enhanced from the 101 punishing scenarios you have endured every day. Celebrate that knowledge by concluding each day with praise to yourself for your successes! Then each morning wake; not focusing on the errors of yesterday as they cannot be put right, but with excitement for the unknown adventures the day will bring and the manner you will challenge and surpass them because of what you know and the belief in yourself.  


  
  

Society suggests I must let go of all my expectations but I disagree, as whilst I have a voice, I have hope.

Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope is for tomorrow else what is left if you remove a mans hope.
------------------------------

This forum supports these words, thank you Unlock and your contributors.

Completely agree and thank you for the words, I've been told numerous times I need to believe in myself. It's just not happening pretty much because of disclosure and Google. I'm trying to build up my own thing under a different name and I'm proud of the fact I've built up what I have so far... but I'm terrified that ONE public outing on social media, or forced by ppu, or gossip/Google, will once again bring everything crashing down and I don't think I can live through all that again. A random example; My probation officer had never heard of 'doxxing' and that's the problem, I feel so many in CJS/probation/ppus etc don't understand what are very real "21st Century" problems. Remove those walking-on-tightrope possibilities and I can get on with my life but because of this stupid SHPO leaving me unspent for years, any confidence is increasingly fragile rather than strengthening. I don't want to detract from the subject of this thread, but I will take some time to digest more what you've written here, thanks.



=====
Fighting or Accepting - its difficult to know which is right and when.

"My probation officer had never heard of 'doxxing'..."

Either was the officer in charge of me. I got doxxed a few times due to my conviction. The paper report, my face, my full name, where I worked and my bloody home address in some occasions, not just the street that was posted in the paper but the full house number and everything (!!!) were constantly being posted on other forums I frequent tying them to my username.

I knew exactly who it was as we were friends prior to everything so I was aware of their username and reported them to the officer in charge expressing my concerns about it - He was totally unaware and had never heard of Doxxing before so I even had to explain to him how it is totally illegal and even showed and reference the 3 main crimes it breaches being the Computer Misuse Act, Protection From Harassment Act, and the Data Protection Act. Nothing ever came of it.

I then actually just reported the person to the police directly. Again, the officer on the phone didn't really think it was all that serious and "made a note of it". No incident number, nothing.

The essential stalking of me around the internet and harassment continued so I did one thing I'm not proud of and certainly don't condone but I was at my wits end. I went to their house, threatened to cave their head in if they didn't stop. Now, I'm not a violent guy by any means but I am quite big and can look intimidating.

Anyway. It has all stopped. Not had a peep from this person anywhere since January so it obviously worked.

---------------

In answer to your other post Mr W. -

Did you manage to speak to any friend who didn't see the press first?
There was one friend I confided in when it all went down and was a tremendous support throughout the whole thing emotionally and even helped me slightly financially in the beginning with regards to a solicitor (I've since paid them back). I was arrested in February 2019 and my name hit the papers in December 2019. I had a few court dates during that time for various things and my name was nowhere to be found but I guess my luck ran out! So yeah, throughout this ordeal this person was superb. I honestly had no idea how they would've reacted and taken it but I needed to speak to someone about it and I certainly didn't want to approach my parents so I took the gamble. We have since drifted apart since the publicity hit which I offered them a few times basically a "no hard feelings if this all goes to pot. If you want to save face and not be seen I totally understand". Eventually that offer was taken up. I don't think they'd bad mouth me or anything, more just not get involved.

A few (very few) close friends from work reached out to actually find out what happened/what was going on as the paper report was pretty vague and still remains pretty vague and light on what I feel are pertinent details and was worded in a way which makes it sound a lot worse (but that's a whole different conversation).

The ones that did reach out didn't seem overly judgmental. More interested, confused and intrigued by it all and how it didn't resemble me in the slightest. I answered their questions honestly and advised what I reckon the outcome will be (all things considered my sentencing was better than I anticipated). They've since faded into the background. I do think about messaging them sometimes just to see how they're doing, the COVID situation is a good reason to I guess!, but.. I dunno.

Did you see any differences in regard to how people found out? For example, people you spoke to versus people who found out from the press?
Not really, at least not as drastic as you might think. I've always been a somewhat solitary guy and didn't surround myself with a large entourage of people. I was more a quality over quantity guy when it came to friends. I haven't really seen almost anyone face-to-face since it become public aside from one other friend who honestly didn't care about the whole thing. He still sees me as me, the guy he's known for a decade. He sometimes makes little jokes about it which some might say is in bad taste but I don't take it like that and find it funny. Before the COVID thing I was round at his and we were just chatting/joking about and he jokingly asked about when I die if he can have my stuff. "Well, without all your hard drives..."

We have basically just carried on as if this never happened, which is good, I feel.

Where I worked was Ground Zero for everything, for the most part. Rumours and stories like this spread like wildfire in that place and they love a good scandal so I can imagine a lot of them practically fighting over each other to break the news. Most of them have some pretty horrendous skeletons in their closet in that place and I wasn't really friends was the vast majority so I wasn't too bothered by it all in truth.

Everyone aside from my friend mentioned earlier found out via the press. I only actually spoke to a handful of people after it all kicked off publicly. I deleted my Facebook account (for obvious reasons) so I do think more might have maybe reached out via that to either quiz  me or throw abuse. Most other friends I've noticed have just blanked me out of existence - which I don't' have a problem with - when I go onto my XBox or whatever and find they're no longer on my friends list, or I've been removed from a WhatsApp group. Things like that.

And do you feel you could have saved more friendships?     
This is a tricky one. The best answer I can give is possibly. But then the follow up would be "to what end though?". I feel the people that have reached out to me, stuck by me and still speak to me now don't care about public opinion and judge things on their own merits. The ones who haven't reached out I don't feel will ever have been won over. Or at least to make things continue normally. One of my friends has a daughter, she's about 6 now. The three of us used to go into town sometimes to do some shopping and just hang out and stuff. Can you imagine what he'd be feeling walking round town with his daughter and me in tow? I don't blame him in the slightest, to be honest.

I think for most people it isn't so much their thoughts and feelings on it all but the public thought on it. A person is smart, caring, and capable of rational thought. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals.

Especially in the last decade or so my crime isn't exactly a sexy or stylish crime. It's the lowest of the low. Nobody in their right mind would want to be seen dead hanging around with a paedophile for fear of ridicule and/or worse. Until the public perception and laws are changed this will continue to happen to everyone. The wording of the law alone caused some problems which I needed to clear up with some people the in famous - "Creating or allowing to be created..." portion. A lot of people don't understand and instantly assume I'm in my living room videotaping myself abusing children - which obviously wasn't the case.

How do we change perception? I honestly don't know. I think a good step would be to change how the media handles and reports on the crimes. Another would be sorting out the "vigilante" groups who do nothing more than terrorize and build an echo chamber to massage their own self worth and egos. They have caused issues throughout the country time and time again, the police even talk about it constantly how they do more harm than good. So why are they still allowed to operate? My local vigilante group tends to harass everyone they've reported on.

There was someone with a similar crime to myself they "reported" on about 2 years ago. About once a week or so you'd get pictures of them posted by the admins that have clearly been following this person around just trying to go about their business. One interesting take was when they were in a supermarket and had a video of the guy going off at them for following him around etc. and getting quite angry and borderline violent. The usual captions followed "This man is allowed out in public! He's a danger blah blah".

What they failed to mention or show was they had actually been following him around the shop with their camera harassing him shouting "paedo" at him, warning anyone walking past him in the aisles, especially if they had children, all that good stuff. Which then obviously came to boiling point with him, which is totally understandable. Someone had recorded that footage on their own phone after seeing them doing it a couple of times. They posted their video showing all this and calling them out on their page to then be banned and told to take the video down and were berated in the comments being a "paedosympathiser" etc. all for just trying to give some context. They later had a post mentioning how the group reported them to the police for posting their faces and stuff without their permission and essentially forced them to take the video down. Whether that last part with the police is true or not is up for debate but that is what they reported.

The vigilante groups video is still up and they still maintain their usual antics.

When it comes to disclosure, two things strike me. The first is that it almost feels like there is a pressure to disclose, coming from probation, the PPU etc. on a 'just in case' basis, rather than a 'need to know' basis.

Second, disclosure is not something to be taken lightly. This is highly sensitive information, which can wreck lives, if it's revealed inappropriately. When the police disclose to someone, that person is made to sign a form, promising not to reveal the information to anybody else. If they do, it's an offence in itself. The police also have to fill in forms themselves, stating why disclosure was necessary, what the risk was and why disclosure was the best way to address that risk. None of this happens though, if the offender discloses that info voluntarily.

So what seems to happen a lot, is that the offender gets bullied into self disclosure. The PPU will threaten them, saying that if they don't disclose to X, then the PPU will disclose to them instead. That isn't always an idle threat, but it does solve a lot of problems for the PPU, if the offender discloses 'voluntarily', since the PPU can't then be blamed, should the person who has been disclosed then go on to tell other people, and it gets out onto social media, or if an employer finds out and the offender loses their job.

When there are kids involved, things get a lot more simple for the PPU, because it's easy for them to say disclosure was necessary, to safeguard a child. That may be true, or it may just be a convenient excuse for doing a full disclosure. But then, what happens is that the PPU will stretch that 'safeguarding' excuse, further and further, to drag in more and more people. E.g. the offender's wife works as a teacher, so they disclose to the school where she works, even though she has done nothing wrong, and she then loses her job. Or, the offender's wife's, uncle's brother's cousin, just happened to be visiting the house, went the PPU came round and they find out he has a kid, so now he has to be disclosed to, even though he lives miles away and the offender has never even met his kids.

When it comes to adults, things are usually a bit more straightforward, because you don't always have the PPU on your back, insisting on disclosure, but there will still be pressure. Disclosure to employers or landlords is not compulsary, even though some PPU seem to think they have a right to do it anyway. For example if an offender is living in a block of flats, and some of the residents have children. Do they all need to know about his conviction? Does the landlord have to be told? These are judgement calls for the PPU and the answers won't always be consistent. Same with employment, the rules only say you must disclose if the employer asks, but if they don't ask, you don't have to volunteer those details, unless it's working with kids or vulnerable adults.

The PPU appear to make up extra rules sometimes, along the lines of; there might be the slightest possibility of accidentally meeting a child during the job, so that's a risk, and either you can't take the job, or we have to disclose to the employer. Surely that is what the DBS checks are for?  I heard of one guy who was turned down for a job at Greggs, because children sometimes come into the shop. We all know that if you walk down the street, you might pass by a child, so is that a risk that needs safeguarding?  Some PPU would probably say yes, but they know it's just not possible to enforce it, because the offender would effectively be under house arrest and the PPU would be subject to a legal challenge for exceeding their authority. But what about public spaces like parks? Kids go to parks, but so do adults. I know of someone who was sitting in a park, minding his own business, when a kid approached him. He told the PPU about it and was effectively accused of 'luring' the child towards him. He hadn't breached his SHPO, so there was nothing they could do to him, but they still made him feel like he had done something illegal, by just being in the park.

Hi Punter99, I agree with most of what you say, PPUs are in a tough position, but there seems to be more arse covering at the misery of the ex-offender than progression. I've yet to find a legitimate channel to call them out especially when they have an SJW-esque mode, and as that Lancs police officer said the other day on an unrelated matter: "Who are they going to believe" (he apologised). I know you've talked about disclosure generally here, but how did you find disclosing to friends etc what were their reactions? post-conviction etc
===
Hi Khafka,
I was shocked re: lack of knowledge around doxxing because the removal of the information, similar to the problem of revenge porn, can be a nightmare. Once it's out there, it's out there and one's personal details are critical in terms of feeling safe in your own home. Especially when some go one step further, with phone numbers etc. I too was doxxed, thankfully only social media stuff, but it certainly wasn't info that was "publicly available" they had to really search to find it. But it's an important point about why moving forward is made more difficult, when just one person links new name with old in one of those stupid groups then it's all over, an undeserved 'second wave' of punishment and yes, don't get me started on vigilante groups.

Overall, the question must be asked of rehabilitation of these offences, what does true rehabilitation look like in our current society when disclosure is SO debilitating.

=====
Fighting or Accepting - its difficult to know which is right and when.