theForum is run by the charity Unlock. We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions but we may intervene and take any action as we think necessary. Further details can be found in our terms of use. If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report-a-post button or email us at forum@unlock.org.uk.


Lets List Countries That Refuse Entry to people with a SOR


Lets List Countries That Refuse Entry to people with a SOR

Author
Message
JASB
JASB
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (198K reputation)Supreme Being (198K reputation)Supreme Being (198K reputation)Supreme Being (198K reputation)Supreme Being (198K reputation)Supreme Being (198K reputation)Supreme Being (198K reputation)Supreme Being (198K reputation)Supreme Being (198K reputation)

Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 1.1K, Visits: 1.8K
Hi
If you have a sex offence and declare you are going to any high risk area then the Police will stop you.

To me it has nothing to do with any evidence "against you" or "for you" it is Britain wanting to be seen as "the world's leader" against sex offenders.
They do not believe in rehabilitation, but do believe in stopping any form of social/quality of life as they believe that increases the percentage chances of you offending else creating a scenario for you to make a mistake and so can be locked up again; where they want to put all offenders but especially sex offenders.

Remember society and the politicians do not believe in rehabilitation of  sex offenders or in the term "Ex-Sex Offender.




Society suggests I must let go of all my expectations but I disagree, as whilst I have a voice, I have hope.

Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope is for tomorrow else what is left if you remove a mans hope.
------------------------------

This forum supports these words, thank you Unlock and your contributors.

AB2014
AB2014
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (279K reputation)Supreme Being (279K reputation)Supreme Being (279K reputation)Supreme Being (279K reputation)Supreme Being (279K reputation)Supreme Being (279K reputation)Supreme Being (279K reputation)Supreme Being (279K reputation)Supreme Being (279K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K, Visits: 7.7K
JASB - 19 Jul 19 11:26 AM
Hi
If you have a sex offence and declare you are going to any high risk area then the Police will stop you.

To me it has nothing to do with any evidence "against you" or "for you" it is Britain wanting to be seen as "the world's leader" against sex offenders.
They do not believe in rehabilitation, but do believe in stopping any form of social/quality of life as they believe that increases the percentage chances of you offending else creating a scenario for you to make a mistake and so can be locked up again; where they want to put all offenders but especially sex offenders.

Remember society and the politicians do not believe in rehabilitation of  sex offenders or in the term "Ex-Sex Offender.



The police don't have to believe in rehabilitation because it isn't part of their remit. They are there to prevent and detect crime, as part of safeguarding the public. Officially, probation are there for rehabilitation, so once you have finished your licence period, there is no more rehabilitation. I have said before on other threads that you can be an ex-burglar, ex-drug dealer, but not an ex-sex offender.

=========================================================================================================

If you are to punish a man retributively you must injure him. If you are to reform him you must improve him. And men are not improved by injuries. (George Bernard Shaw)

Monkos
Monkos
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (21K reputation)Supreme Being (21K reputation)Supreme Being (21K reputation)Supreme Being (21K reputation)Supreme Being (21K reputation)Supreme Being (21K reputation)Supreme Being (21K reputation)Supreme Being (21K reputation)Supreme Being (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 81, Visits: 415
More bad advice on this thread, no one at Unlock bothering to correct it either. If in doubt, get a lawyer. Even for people on the SOR, there is very little the police can do to interfere with your travel.
AB2014
AB2014
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (279K reputation)Supreme Being (279K reputation)Supreme Being (279K reputation)Supreme Being (279K reputation)Supreme Being (279K reputation)Supreme Being (279K reputation)Supreme Being (279K reputation)Supreme Being (279K reputation)Supreme Being (279K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K, Visits: 7.7K
Monkos - 5 Aug 19 5:01 PM
More bad advice on this thread, no one at Unlock bothering to correct it either. If in doubt, get a lawyer. Even for people on the SOR, there is very little the police can do to interfere with your travel.

Which is the advice that you think is bad, and when did you inform Unlock to tell them that and ask them to correct it?

=========================================================================================================

If you are to punish a man retributively you must injure him. If you are to reform him you must improve him. And men are not improved by injuries. (George Bernard Shaw)

Monkos
Monkos
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (21K reputation)Supreme Being (21K reputation)Supreme Being (21K reputation)Supreme Being (21K reputation)Supreme Being (21K reputation)Supreme Being (21K reputation)Supreme Being (21K reputation)Supreme Being (21K reputation)Supreme Being (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 81, Visits: 415
AB2014 - 6 Aug 19 8:54 AM
Monkos - 5 Aug 19 5:01 PM
More bad advice on this thread, no one at Unlock bothering to correct it either. If in doubt, get a lawyer. Even for people on the SOR, there is very little the police can do to interfere with your travel.

Which is the advice that you think is bad, and when did you inform Unlock to tell them that and ask them to correct it?

Months ago, but they don't give a shit.
RMUK
RMUK
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (6K reputation)Supreme Being (6K reputation)Supreme Being (6K reputation)Supreme Being (6K reputation)Supreme Being (6K reputation)Supreme Being (6K reputation)Supreme Being (6K reputation)Supreme Being (6K reputation)Supreme Being (6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20, Visits: 129
JASB - 19 Jul 19 11:26 AM
Hi
If you have a sex offence and declare you are going to any high risk area then the Police will stop you.

To me it has nothing to do with any evidence "against you" or "for you" it is Britain wanting to be seen as "the world's leader" against sex offenders.
They do not believe in rehabilitation, but do believe in stopping any form of social/quality of life as they believe that increases the percentage chances of you offending else creating a scenario for you to make a mistake and so can be locked up again; where they want to put all offenders but especially sex offenders.

Remember society and the politicians do not believe in rehabilitation of  sex offenders or in the term "Ex-Sex Offender.



What do you classify as a "high risk area"? 
RMUK
RMUK
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (6K reputation)Supreme Being (6K reputation)Supreme Being (6K reputation)Supreme Being (6K reputation)Supreme Being (6K reputation)Supreme Being (6K reputation)Supreme Being (6K reputation)Supreme Being (6K reputation)Supreme Being (6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20, Visits: 129
I got into Dominican Republic with absolutely no issues - see my update on the other thread for anyone planning to go there:
https://forum.unlock.org.uk/Topic11221.aspx

Harry
Harry
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (23K reputation)Supreme Being (23K reputation)Supreme Being (23K reputation)Supreme Being (23K reputation)Supreme Being (23K reputation)Supreme Being (23K reputation)Supreme Being (23K reputation)Supreme Being (23K reputation)Supreme Being (23K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 88, Visits: 197
Harry53 - 26 Feb 18 4:06 PM
Yankee - 21 Feb 18 9:09 PM
Harry53 - 19 Feb 18 5:00 PM
(SOR = Sexual offenders register)
I am writing from the UK and I have a 10 year SOR.
One spin off from this is the restriction of travel. So I thought why don't we all build a listings of countries that are quite rightly protecting children from abusers. I will start the list off but please add to it. Some cojuntries are obvious but others like Japan may still ask the question which pose problems. I want to hear from anyone who has in the last year, known of any problems gaining entry to countries, or that have refused entry. 

There seems to be no listing that is up-to-date, so I thought this would be useful.

For example, I was told that Indonesia was ok to visit, but on posting on an expats forum, it seems most likely not. So here goes....countries I am 95% sure will refuse entry to anyone on the SOR:
1  THAILAND
2  INDIA
3  SRI LANKA
4  PHILIPPINES
5  MALAYSIA
6  CAMBODIA
7  INDONESIA
8  VIETNAM
9  SINGAPORE

Some countries like NEW ZEALAND ask if you have ever been refused entry to a country, which means it is best to apply for a visa and disclose details.

Please add to this list as having experienced being refused entry into the Philippines just 8 weeks after visiting, I feel it is of the utmost importance to do research before booking a flight or holiday. To be turned away is the most stressful and embarrassing experience in my entire life. Do NOT LET IT HAPPEN TO YOU.

Harry - its not that simple and you have to look at several variables.

1. Does the country allow entry simply because there are no visa requirements for a 'serious criminal offence' i.e. you don't have to lie on any form?
2. Does the country have an entry card / visa requirement to declare but would have no way of finding out if you were inclined to be less than truthful.
3. How does the PPU assess your risk and therefore the likelihood or otherwise that they will issue an Interpol green notice if you travel
4. If a green notice is issued, does the particular country check and update their own information systems or it just goes into a black hole
5. For low risk and no green notice issued, is your information still shared with the other country (e.g. FCC agreements or embassy to embassy)







To be honest I have no idea what country filters out information on passports and that's the problem. Lie and you can be caught which is embarrassing, or don't delay it as they don't ask, then find that it comes to light at passport control.
The PPU know I am no risk to anyone so I am told by them that it is their duty to inform Interpol of my travel arrangements, as they did just weeks after I had visited my BF.
As for your other questions I want the answers to those as well. I really feel it is an injustice to not inform anyone with a criminal record as to where they can go and how our data is stored. 

Sorry to keep this thread alive but just back from Barcelona from the UK. On arrival I get asked many questions about my visit and then again on my exit. It really ruins my mood and I cannot understand why this happens. When I arrived back in the UK I asked the immigration officer what is on my passport and he says nothing. So bring on a SOR, I can only imagine someone in the police are making their job to make my life uncomfortable . It is beyond me as to why they (I guess) inform countries that i travel to. I had an internet offence. Thats it . No contact, and I never killed anyone - but I get treated like this. 

In your opinion is it only because the Police send notices to my travelling countries? 
Yankee
Yankee
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (87K reputation)Supreme Being (87K reputation)Supreme Being (87K reputation)Supreme Being (87K reputation)Supreme Being (87K reputation)Supreme Being (87K reputation)Supreme Being (87K reputation)Supreme Being (87K reputation)Supreme Being (87K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 232, Visits: 994
Harry53 - 28 Sep 19 4:57 PM
Harry53 - 26 Feb 18 4:06 PM
Yankee - 21 Feb 18 9:09 PM
Harry53 - 19 Feb 18 5:00 PM
(SOR = Sexual offenders register)
I am writing from the UK and I have a 10 year SOR.
One spin off from this is the restriction of travel. So I thought why don't we all build a listings of countries that are quite rightly protecting children from abusers. I will start the list off but please add to it. Some cojuntries are obvious but others like Japan may still ask the question which pose problems. I want to hear from anyone who has in the last year, known of any problems gaining entry to countries, or that have refused entry. 

There seems to be no listing that is up-to-date, so I thought this would be useful.

For example, I was told that Indonesia was ok to visit, but on posting on an expats forum, it seems most likely not. So here goes....countries I am 95% sure will refuse entry to anyone on the SOR:
1  THAILAND
2  INDIA
3  SRI LANKA
4  PHILIPPINES
5  MALAYSIA
6  CAMBODIA
7  INDONESIA
8  VIETNAM
9  SINGAPORE

Some countries like NEW ZEALAND ask if you have ever been refused entry to a country, which means it is best to apply for a visa and disclose details.

Please add to this list as having experienced being refused entry into the Philippines just 8 weeks after visiting, I feel it is of the utmost importance to do research before booking a flight or holiday. To be turned away is the most stressful and embarrassing experience in my entire life. Do NOT LET IT HAPPEN TO YOU.

Harry - its not that simple and you have to look at several variables.

1. Does the country allow entry simply because there are no visa requirements for a 'serious criminal offence' i.e. you don't have to lie on any form?
2. Does the country have an entry card / visa requirement to declare but would have no way of finding out if you were inclined to be less than truthful.
3. How does the PPU assess your risk and therefore the likelihood or otherwise that they will issue an Interpol green notice if you travel
4. If a green notice is issued, does the particular country check and update their own information systems or it just goes into a black hole
5. For low risk and no green notice issued, is your information still shared with the other country (e.g. FCC agreements or embassy to embassy)







To be honest I have no idea what country filters out information on passports and that's the problem. Lie and you can be caught which is embarrassing, or don't delay it as they don't ask, then find that it comes to light at passport control.
The PPU know I am no risk to anyone so I am told by them that it is their duty to inform Interpol of my travel arrangements, as they did just weeks after I had visited my BF.
As for your other questions I want the answers to those as well. I really feel it is an injustice to not inform anyone with a criminal record as to where they can go and how our data is stored. 

Sorry to keep this thread alive but just back from Barcelona from the UK. On arrival I get asked many questions about my visit and then again on my exit. It really ruins my mood and I cannot understand why this happens. When I arrived back in the UK I asked the immigration officer what is on my passport and he says nothing. So bring on a SOR, I can only imagine someone in the police are making their job to make my life uncomfortable . It is beyond me as to why they (I guess) inform countries that i travel to. I had an internet offence. Thats it . No contact, and I never killed anyone - but I get treated like this. 

In your opinion is it only because the Police send notices to my travelling countries? 

If you are travelling to another EU country, you will be flagged automatically - the UK police raise an alert on the Schengen Information System (SISII) for anyone who notifies.  This is meant to be a discreet check, it does not prevent you travelling or entering/leaving the country. There are other threads on the forum and other posts on this topic where members have described their personal experiences - in summary, it varies significantly depending upon country, airport and whether the immigration officer has seen a similar alert before and knows what to do... Your experience in Barcelona is par for the course unfortunately.
AB2014
AB2014
Supreme Being
Supreme Being (279K reputation)Supreme Being (279K reputation)Supreme Being (279K reputation)Supreme Being (279K reputation)Supreme Being (279K reputation)Supreme Being (279K reputation)Supreme Being (279K reputation)Supreme Being (279K reputation)Supreme Being (279K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K, Visits: 7.7K
Yankee - 30 Sep 19 9:01 AM
Harry53 - 28 Sep 19 4:57 PM
Harry53 - 26 Feb 18 4:06 PM
Yankee - 21 Feb 18 9:09 PM
Harry53 - 19 Feb 18 5:00 PM
(SOR = Sexual offenders register)
I am writing from the UK and I have a 10 year SOR.
One spin off from this is the restriction of travel. So I thought why don't we all build a listings of countries that are quite rightly protecting children from abusers. I will start the list off but please add to it. Some cojuntries are obvious but others like Japan may still ask the question which pose problems. I want to hear from anyone who has in the last year, known of any problems gaining entry to countries, or that have refused entry. 

There seems to be no listing that is up-to-date, so I thought this would be useful.

For example, I was told that Indonesia was ok to visit, but on posting on an expats forum, it seems most likely not. So here goes....countries I am 95% sure will refuse entry to anyone on the SOR:
1  THAILAND
2  INDIA
3  SRI LANKA
4  PHILIPPINES
5  MALAYSIA
6  CAMBODIA
7  INDONESIA
8  VIETNAM
9  SINGAPORE

Some countries like NEW ZEALAND ask if you have ever been refused entry to a country, which means it is best to apply for a visa and disclose details.

Please add to this list as having experienced being refused entry into the Philippines just 8 weeks after visiting, I feel it is of the utmost importance to do research before booking a flight or holiday. To be turned away is the most stressful and embarrassing experience in my entire life. Do NOT LET IT HAPPEN TO YOU.

Harry - its not that simple and you have to look at several variables.

1. Does the country allow entry simply because there are no visa requirements for a 'serious criminal offence' i.e. you don't have to lie on any form?
2. Does the country have an entry card / visa requirement to declare but would have no way of finding out if you were inclined to be less than truthful.
3. How does the PPU assess your risk and therefore the likelihood or otherwise that they will issue an Interpol green notice if you travel
4. If a green notice is issued, does the particular country check and update their own information systems or it just goes into a black hole
5. For low risk and no green notice issued, is your information still shared with the other country (e.g. FCC agreements or embassy to embassy)







To be honest I have no idea what country filters out information on passports and that's the problem. Lie and you can be caught which is embarrassing, or don't delay it as they don't ask, then find that it comes to light at passport control.
The PPU know I am no risk to anyone so I am told by them that it is their duty to inform Interpol of my travel arrangements, as they did just weeks after I had visited my BF.
As for your other questions I want the answers to those as well. I really feel it is an injustice to not inform anyone with a criminal record as to where they can go and how our data is stored. 

Sorry to keep this thread alive but just back from Barcelona from the UK. On arrival I get asked many questions about my visit and then again on my exit. It really ruins my mood and I cannot understand why this happens. When I arrived back in the UK I asked the immigration officer what is on my passport and he says nothing. So bring on a SOR, I can only imagine someone in the police are making their job to make my life uncomfortable . It is beyond me as to why they (I guess) inform countries that i travel to. I had an internet offence. Thats it . No contact, and I never killed anyone - but I get treated like this. 

In your opinion is it only because the Police send notices to my travelling countries? 

If you are travelling to another EU country, you will be flagged automatically - the UK police raise an alert on the Schengen Information System (SISII) for anyone who notifies.  This is meant to be a discreet check, it does not prevent you travelling or entering/leaving the country. There are other threads on the forum and other posts on this topic where members have described their personal experiences - in summary, it varies significantly depending upon country, airport and whether the immigration officer has seen a similar alert before and knows what to do... Your experience in Barcelona is par for the course unfortunately.

The check on returning is not rare, either. It's not personal, though, and it does confirm your return to the police so you don't have to do it.

=========================================================================================================

If you are to punish a man retributively you must injure him. If you are to reform him you must improve him. And men are not improved by injuries. (George Bernard Shaw)

 
GO


Similar Topics


As a small but national charity, we rely on charitable grants and individual donations to continue running theForum. We do not deliver government services. By being independent, we are able to respond to the needs of the people with convictions. Help us keep theForum going.

Donate Online

Login
Existing Account
Email Address:


Password:


Login
Select a Forum....
























































































































































































theForum


Search