I have more to say but right now it’s not letting me post long paragraphs again!!

That is interesting, In her eyes she believes it is smith compliant yet accepts you did not receive your SHPO in advance which makes it non smith compliant. SHPO's must be drafted to be proportionate to an individuals offence and must be given in advanced of any hearing to be amended, which is supposed to stop the miss use of the SHPO and ultimately not include orders which require notifications. Because that is the purpose of the notification requirements which has been previously stated does not include registering new devices. Forgive me for asking but if you are willing, what was the offence?

She did bring up the notification requirements because she said they don’t include reporting of devices they have to include it in the SHPO.

My offence was, attempted sexual communication with a child.